Basilio Rudas L. Lemus v. The Government of the Canal Zone, No. 71-1144 Summary Calendar

Basilio Rudas L. Lemus v. The Government of the Canal Zone, No. 71-1144 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part. I

Basilio Rudas L. Lemus v. The Gov't of the Canal Zone, No. 71-1144 Summary Calendar, 443 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: May 25, 1971
Docket: No. 23
Citations: 443 F.2d 23

Cited by 7 Original from court

Opinion

443 F.2d 23

Basilio Rudas L. LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant, v. The GOVERNMENT OF the CANAL ZONE, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 71-1144 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part. I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 25, 1971.

Basilio Rudas L. Lemus, pro se.

Lester Engler, U.S. Atty., Wallace D. Baldwin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Balboa, Canal Zone, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case comes to us on an appeal from the conviction of defendant after a non-jury trial for the offense of selling cocaine in violation of Title 26, 4705(a). We must also pass on the motion of defendant's trial counsel, the public defender, to withdraw as counsel on appeal.

The public defender has performed his function as appeal counsel in strict conformity with Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , but has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Defendant has filed his own brief in addition to the brief filed by the public defender.

We have carefully considered the cause in its entirety and find no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered that the motion of the public defender to withdraw as appeal counsel is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Charles Edward Minor, No. 30544 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Johnny Lincoln Mills, No. 71-1219 Summary Calendar446 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir. 1971)
Hawkins v. State268 So. 2d 492 (Ala. Crim. App. 1972)
United States v. James Dennis King456 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1972)
United States v. Charles Edward Minor444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Johnny Lincoln Mills446 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir. 1971)

Most recent

United States v. Joseph Eugene Venable474 F.2d 1398 (5th Cir. 1973)
Hawkins v. State268 So. 2d 492 (Ala. Crim. App. 1972)
United States v. James Dennis King456 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1972)
United States v. Johnny Lincoln Mills, No. 71-1219 Summary Calendar446 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Johnny Lincoln Mills446 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Charles Edward Minor, No. 30544 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)	83,798
	Isbell Enters. v. Citizens Cas. Co, 431 F.2d 409 (3d Cir. 1970)	3,975
	Basilio Rudas L. Lemus v. The Gov't of the Canal Zone, 443 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1971)	1

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list