TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr

UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph Arthur KEENAN Et Al. Appeal of Michael Joseph O’CONNOR

United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr, 443 F.2d 381 (3d Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 15, 1971
Docket
No. 19042
Judges
Staley, Adams, Garth
Citations
443 F.2d 3811971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9556

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for correction of sentence. Appellant asserts that the oral pronouncement of sentence differed from and should prevail over the written commitment. We have carefully examined the record with regard to the sentencing of appellant and find nothing that supports his assertions.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1991: 119912026peak 1991 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Thomas Chasmer952 F.2d 50 (3d Cir. 1991)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Thomas Chasmer952 F.2d 50 (3d Cir. 1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list