TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Vito Bongiorno

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vito BONGIORNO, Appellant

United States v. Bongiorno, 444 F.2d 120 (10th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 23, 1971
Docket
No. 469-70
Judges
Lewis, Pickett, Jones
Citations
444 F.2d 1201971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9373

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted of a Dyer Act violation. He was stopped in New Mexico by a state highway patrolman because his license plates were fastened to the car only at one corner of the plates. They were loose, dangling and swinging. When the officer stopped the car, he asked for registration documents and found that these did not agree with the numbers on the car. The officer took the car and driver into Moriarity, New Mexico, and questioned him. It developed that the car was stolen. A motion to suppress evidence was denied. The contention made in the district *121 court and the only contention here urged is that the officer had no right to stop the car, that the arrest was unlawful and the search was illegal.

Section 64-3-13(b), New Mexico Statutes Annotated, 1953, requires that every motor vehicle registration plate be at all times securely fastened in a horizontal position to the vehicle for which it is issued, so as to prevent the plate from swinging. The provision’s express purpose is that the plates be “clearly visible” and “clearly legible.” No exception is made for vehicles of nonresidents, and by Section 64-3-1, violation of the section is a misdemeanor.

The officer, having observed the commission of a criminal offense, was acting within his rights in stopping the car, requiring production of identification of the car and, upon discovering the discrepancies, of taking the car and its driver into town. The development of the information as to the ownership of the car and its unlawful transportation were proper incidents of the search and seizure of the car. The judgment and sentence of the district court is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1997: 219972026peak 1997 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City of Albuquerque v. Haywood1998 NMCA 029
  2. In re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00)954 P.2d 93 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997)

Most recent

  1. In re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00)954 P.2d 93 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997)
  2. City of Albuquerque v. Haywood1998 NMCA 029

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list