Southern Louisiana Area Rate Cases. Austral Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
In Re SOUTHERN LOUISIANA AREA RATE CASES; AUSTRAL OIL CO. Et Al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent
Subsequent history: aff'd, Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 417 U.S. 283 (1974). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
In our original opinion, 428 F.2d 407 , we indicated that there was new evidence of a possible impending gas supply shortage. Our affirmance of the Commission’s orders is structured so as to allow the Commission great flexibility in dealing with this problem. To this end, we indicated that the Commission had authority under section 16 of the Natural Gas Act to stay, modify or rescind any part of its order, notwithstanding our affirmance, if circumstances appearing since the issuance of the orders make a change advisable. Petitioners on rehearing, however, have argued to this Court that the Commission may exercise this power prospectively only; that is, petitioners argue that affirmance by this Court would preclude the Commission from reexamining revenues from gas that has already been delivered. We wish to make crystal clear the authority of the Commission in this case to reopen any part of its order that circumstances require be reopened. Under section 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act, this Court has the broad remedial powers that inhere in a court of equity, and pursuant to our equitable powers we make it part of the remedy in this case that the authority of the Commission to reopen any part of its orders, including those affecting revenues from gas already delivered, is left intact. The Commission can make retrospective as well as prospective adjust *127 ments in this case if it finds that it is in the public interest to do so.
At the same time, we emphasize that our judgment is an affirmance and not a remand. The appropriate place for originally considering what parts of the orders must be reopened in light of new evidence is before the Commission. It may be that the Commission will decide that the refunds it has ordered are just and reasonable or at least that their significance to the public interest is outweighed by the confusion and delay that would result from their reopening. In this event, the Commission will allow its refund orders to stand as they are. Or it may be that the refunds are too burdensome in light of new evidence to be in the public interest. In that case, it is our judgment that the Commission shall have the power and the duty to remedy the situation by changing its orders.
In all other respects, the original opinion of this Court is the final disposition of this appeal.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 19 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power Commission
- Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, and Consolidated Cases. In Re National Rate Cases for New Gas
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
- Other Southwest Area Rate Case (Oswa I). Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission
- Public Service Commission of the State of New York, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation Sun Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation . General Crude Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation . M.H. Marr, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation . Continental Oil Company, v Federal Power Commission, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation and Philadelphia Gas Works Division of Ugi Corporation . Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, v Federal Power Commission, Sun Oil Company
Most recent
- Borden, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Triton Oil & Gas Corporation
- The Superior Oil Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Western Slope Gas Company, a Colorado Corporation, Continental Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Western Slope Gas Company, a Colorado Corporation
- Superior Oil Co. v. Western Slope Gas Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.