TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States of America, and v. Adolfo De La Parra

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Adolfo DE LA PARRA, Appellant

United States, and v. Adolfo De La Parra, 445 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 20, 1971
Docket
No. 71-1255
Judges
Chambers, Merrill, Ely
Citations
445 F.2d 1405

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We reject the double jeopardy argument on this conviction for failure to take a selective service physical examination which he had been ordered to take.

We do not find the punitive aspects here that were present in United States v. Hayden, 9 Cir., 445 F.2d 1365 decided April 9, 1971, which is clearly distinguishable.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11972: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Christian Winslow Hayden445 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1971)
  2. United States v. William M. Heywood469 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1972)

Most recent

  1. United States v. William M. Heywood469 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1972)
  2. United States v. Christian Winslow Hayden445 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Hayden, 445 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1971) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list