TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wendell Asbury Bruce, Jr. v. United States

Wendell Asbury BRUCE, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Bruce v. United States, 448 F.2d 21 (4th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 9, 1971
Docket
No. 71-1345
Judges
Bryan, Craven, Butzner
Citations
448 F.2d 211971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8149

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Wendell Asbury Bruce, Jr., is appealing from his conviction, 322 F. Supp. 363 , for refusing to report for physical examination and induction in violation of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C. Appendix, Section 462. After a review of the record and upon consideration of appellee’s motion for summary affirmance and appellant’s motion for summary reversal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary and deny both motions. We think the case should be remanded to the District Court for a full evidentiary hearing to determine whether Bruce’s order to report for induction was illegally accelerated by reason of his delinquency as forbidden by Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 , 90 S.Ct. 506 , 24 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970).

Our disposition is grounded upon evidence in the record of possible illegal acceleration notwithstanding the stipulation between counsel to the contrary. It appears that the District Court was deprived of a full exploration of the acceleration issue by this stipulation. Nor did the District Court have the benefit of United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417 (4 Cir. 1971), which held that in light of Gutknecht, supra, the Government must carry the burden of *22 proving the registrant’s induction was not accelerated. Although not conclusive, the evidence here indicates that Bruce’s name appeared on the delivery list for October 6, 1969 under the heading “Delinquent — For Immediate Induction”, and his name was listed out of order on a separate sheet.

In view of our disposition of the case, we do not consider appellant’s other assignments of error.

Vacated and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11973: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Schwartz366 F. Supp. 443 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
  2. Wendell Asbury Bruce, Jr. v. United States458 F.2d 511 (4th Cir. 1972)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Schwartz366 F. Supp. 443 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
  2. Wendell Asbury Bruce, Jr. v. United States458 F.2d 511 (4th Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 (1970) 164
United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir. 1971) 9
United States v. Bruce, 322 F. Supp. 363 (D.S.C. 1971) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list