Thomas J. Smith, United States of America v. St. Tammany Parish School Board
Thomas J. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
In order to reach solutions for the differing problems incident to a specific school desegregation process district courts are necessarily granted broad powers to achieve these constitutional ends. Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 . We conclude that under the facts of this case the order, 316 F. Supp. 1174 , banning symbols or indicia expressing the school board’s or its employees’
desire to maintain segregated schools and requiring that they “shall be removed from the schools and shall not be officially displayed” is fully warranted. So, too, do we find that the court properly directed the formation of a biracial committee, as previously recommended in an earlier order of the court. The order requiring the appointment of a black assistant principal for Covington High School, having a student body one-third black, is warranted in light of our earlier decision in Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir., 419 F.2d 1211 .
It appearing that no stay of the district court’s order was applied for and that there has been no delay caused by this appeal, appellants’ request for double costs and attorney’s fees is not granted.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.