TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Clifford N. Steele v. The Board of Public Instruction of Leon County, Florida

Clifford N. STEELE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Steele v. The Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Leon Cnty., Fla., 448 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 3, 1971
Docket
No. 71-2265
Judges
Wisdom, Coleman, Simpson
Citations
448 F.2d 7671971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8218

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The district court, sua sponte, dismissed this school integration case after making a finding that the school system was desegregated and unitary in nature. Plaintiffs-appellants urge on this appeal that the cause should not have been dismissed, but rather should be maintained on the inactive docket for the next three school years, during which time the school district would be required to file status reports on the state of desegregation in the school system. Appellants further ask that the district court be directed to dismiss the suit at the termination of the three year period only after notice and hearing at which appellants would be permitted an opportunity to show why dismissal of the cause should be further delayed.

It is ordered by the Court:

1. The order of the district court dismissing this action is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to reinstate the action, and to retain jurisdiction over the action for a period not less than three school years. During the next three school years the school district shall be required by the court below to file semi-annual reports with the district court similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1970, 433 F.2d 611, 618-619 .

2. At the conclusion of three school years the district court should again consider whether the cause should be dismissed. In no event, however, shall the district court dismiss the action without notice to the plaintiffs below and a hear *768 ing providing opportunity to plaintiffs-appellants to show cause why dismissal of the cause should be further delayed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11975: 11978: 21980: 11986: 11999: 12012: 119712026peak 1978 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Hinds Cnty. Sch. Bd., 433 F.2d 611 (5th Cir. 1970) 78

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list