National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 85, Ibtcwha
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 85, IBTCWHA, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The proposed order of the Board will be enforced.
The decision of the Board is presently found at 186 NLRB No. 72 .
The question here is whether the proposed order is overbroad. We find a propensity for secondary boycotts often accompanied by violence is well documented by the record and by incidents of which the Board and a court may properly take judicial notice. See, for example, Hoffman v. Local 85, 74 LRRM 2225.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Shell Oil Company v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Gladys Selvin
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 85, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
- National Labor Relations Board v. Theatre & Amusement Janitors Union, Local 9, Service Employees International Union, Afl-Cio
Most recent
- National Labor Relations Board v. Theatre & Amusement Janitors Union, Local 9, Service Employees International Union, Afl-Cio
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Gladys Selvin
- Shell Oil Company v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 85, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.