TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Small v. Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California

Application of John T. Small v. Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, and Commanding Officer, Staging Battalion, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California (Mcc 050)

Small v. Commanding Gen., Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, Cal., 448 F.2d 1397 (9th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 26, 1971
Docket
No. 71-1391
Citations
448 F.2d 1397

Opinion

448 F.2d 1397

Application of John T. SMALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA, and Commanding Officer, Staging Battalion, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California (MCC 050), Respondents-Appellees.

No. 71-1391.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 1971.

Byron J. Walters (argued), Canoga Park, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

Alan R. Perry, (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Frederick B. Holoboff, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for respondents-appellees.

Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

1

Petitioner-appellant Small is an enlisted man on active duty in the Marine Corps. On June 9, 1970, he was tried and convicted by a special court-martial for the sale of marijuana. His conviction was reviewed and approved by the Staff Judge Advocate, Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego, California.

2

Instead of seeking review by the Judge Advocate General of the Navy pursuant to 10 U.S.C. Sec. 869 (1971 Supp.) (Article 69 of the UCMJ), Small sought habeas corpus in the Southern District of California.

3

The district court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust all military remedies. Small appealed. At the time of oral argument, the court indicated from the bench that the judgment of the district court was affirmed.

4

We do so for the reasons set forth by the district court and adopt as our own its opinion reported at 320 F.Supp. 1044 (S.D.Cal.1970). A petition for rehearing will not be entertained.

5

Affirmed.

* Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1982: 119822026peak 1982 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kaiser v. Secretary of the Navy542 F. Supp. 1263 (D. Colo. 1982)

Most recent

  1. Kaiser v. Secretary of the Navy542 F. Supp. 1263 (D. Colo. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Small v. Commanding Gen., 320 F. Supp. 1044 (S.D. Cal. 1970) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list