TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Bbf Liquidating, Inc.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. BBF LIQUIDATING, INC., Appellee

United States v. Bbf Liquidating, Inc., 450 F.2d 938 (9th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 29, 1971
Docket
No. 71-1360
Judges
Chambers, Choy, Muecke, Per Curiam
Citations
450 F.2d 938

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The order dismissing the indictment against BBF Liquidating, Inc. is reversed. The district court is directed to reinstate the indictment.

The question is whether a dissolved California corporation can be federally indicted after dissolution. Here the district court seems to have followed United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 10 Cir., 140 F.2d 834 .

However, generally we elect to follow United States v. San Diego Grocers Association, Inc., S.D.Cal., 177 F.Supp. 352 , which reaches an opposite result from Safeway, supra.

We take San Diego Grocers Association to be a holding that a dissolved California corporation has the same vitality for all criminal prosecutions as it does for civil actions.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 21985: 11991: 119742026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Polizzi500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974) · Concurrence
  2. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior Court812 P.2d 154 (Cal. 1991)
  3. United States v. Michael Santo Polizzi, United States of America v500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Mobile Materials Company776 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir. 1985)

Most recent

  1. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior Court812 P.2d 154 (Cal. 1991)
  2. United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Mobile Materials Company776 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir. 1985)
  3. United States v. Michael Santo Polizzi, United States of America v500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Polizzi500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974) · Concurrence

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 140 F.2d 834 (10th Cir. 1944) 37
United States v. San Diego Grocers Ass'n, 177 F. Supp. 352 (S.D. Cal. 1959) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list