Andrew Robert Banks v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County
Andrew Robert BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.
1
1
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).
This case originated as a three-judge case, Banks v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, 314 F.Supp. 285 (S.D.Fla.1970) and was reversed and remanded for a fresh decree by the Supreme Court, 401 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1223 , 28 L.Ed.2d 526 (1971). Upon remand the single district judge entered the order here appealed adopting as his findings of fact and conclusions of law that portion of the opinion of the three-judge court concerning the Frist Amendment challenge to Board Regulation 6122. j
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 21 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals10
- Federal District Courts4
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts2
- State Attorney General Opinions2
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.