TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Willie Ben McCrary v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

Willie Ben McCRARY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee

McCrary v. Wainwright, 451 F.2d 360 (5th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 9, 1971
Docket
No. 71-1665
Judges
Gewin, Goldberg, Dyer
Citations
451 F.2d 3601971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7202

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the petition of a Florida state prisoner for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

McCrary is serving a 25 year sentence for armed robbery, having been convicted upon trial by jury. No direct appeal was taken. A motion to vacate sentence filed in the state trial court pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 1.850, 33 F.S.A., was denied after an evidentiary hearing and affirmed on appeal. McCrary v. State, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 445 .

The single issue before the court below was whether the prosecution knowingly used perjured testimony to obtain a conviction. McCrary alleged that the state prosecuting attorney promised Mc-Crary’s co-defendant a probated sentence and paid him five dollars to testify that McCrary participated in the crime. This same issue was the subject of the evidentiary hearing in the state court at which the prosecutor testified that he paid no money and made no promises to obtain the co-defendant’s testimony. Mc-Crary offered the testimony of the co-defendant in support of his allegations. The state court found no credible testimony to support McCrary’s allegations. The United States District Court found that McCrary was afforded a full and fair state hearing and adopted the state court’s findings as its own.

The District Court is not required to hold a second evidentiary hearing in these circumstances. Ryan v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1970, 424 F.2d 198 .

A review of the record, including the transcript of the state evidentiary hearing, reveals no clear error in the findings of the District Court. 28 U.S. C.A. § 2254. The judgment below is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. William Louis Coursey v. Dr. George J. Beto455 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1972)

Most recent

  1. William Louis Coursey v. Dr. George J. Beto455 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Ryan v. Wainwright, 424 F.2d 198 (5th Cir. 1970) 8
McCrary v. State, 220 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list