United States v. Gary Alfred Jack
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gary Alfred JACK, Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Gary Alfred Jack failed to report for induction after being properly classified and receiving a valid induction order. He was convicted, and appeals.
We find that the local board’s decision not to reopen was made in accordance with the provisions of 32 C.F.R. 1625.2. Any prejudice Jack might have suffered in connection with a prior 1-A classification was cured by a subsequent reopening at his request and new classification of 1-A-O. Evans v. United States, 252 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1958). His order to report for induction followed his new classification, and was valid.
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.