TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Roberto Magana

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Magana, 453 F.2d 414 (9th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 6, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1086
Judges
Hamley, Duniway, Trask
Citations
453 F.2d 4141972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11988

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a conviction in the United States District Court based upon a one count indictment charging that the appellant “knowingly and unlawfully received, concealed, and facilitated the concealment and transportation” of heroin, contrary to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 174 . Trial was to the court without a jury and the defendant was sentenced to five years imprisonment. We affirm.

The single assignment of error is that the government failed to establish that the appellant knowingly and unlawfully violated the statute.

On this appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the government. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). Although the appellant took the stand and testified to his innocence, the evidence was overwhelmingly to the contrary.

The government produced evidence that appellant appeared on three occasions when narcotics were transferred. The third occasion was that upon which the indictment was based. Appellant’s uncle, who actually handed the heroin to the government agent, explained that appellant was present because he was the source of supply. The appellant testified he lived in Tijuana, Mexico, and had come to the United States the day before the sale in question. Government agents observed him hand the box, which was later found to contain the heroin, to his uncle, who in turn delivered it to the undercover agent.

It was only necessary that the government present facts from which the trier of fact could draw the reasonable inference that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Brown, 436 F.2d 702, 704 (9th Cir. 1970). This burden the government clearly met.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 11973: 61976: 31978: 119722026peak 1973 · 6

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 (1942) 8,798
United States v. Brown, 436 F.2d 702 (9th Cir. 1970) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list