TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Len J. Dillon v. F. Steven Berg

Len J. DILLON Et Al. v. F. Steven BERG Et Al., Appellants

Dillon v. F. Steven Berg, 453 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 30, 1971
Docket
Nos. 71-1520, 71-1760
Judges
Hastie, Aldisert, Rosen
Citations
453 F.2d 8761971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6327

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

Finding that a solicitation of proxies for the 1970 annual shareholders’ meeting of Scotten, Dillon Company, a corporation, had been supported by accompanying data that was materially false and misleading, the District Court for the District of Delaware has ruled that the proxies thus obtained and the meeting at which they were voted were illegal. 1971, 326 F.Supp. 1214 . The order of the court also contained detailed provisions for calling and conducting a special shareholders’ meeting at which the qualified shareholders would be, as nearly as practicable, those who were eligible to participate in the voided meeting. This appeal has been taken from that order.

Several of the representations in the proxy material were correct and valid only if Ralph R. Power, a director of the corporation, had resigned in April 1970. In the circumstances permissibly found by the district court and set out in its opinion, we agree that the purported resignation of Power was not effective. Therefore, significant proxy materials were in fact false and misleading in several particulars enumerated and discussed in the opinion of the district court. 326 F.Supp. at 1223, 1225-1228 . We find it unnecessary to consider other challenged proxy materials that were unrelated to the status of Power.

Both the action of the district court in invalidating the 1970 annual shareholders’ meeting and its prescription of conditions of eligibility for participation in a special meeting to be held pursuant to the court’s order were proper.

The judgment will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 29 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 21973: 31975: 11976: 21977: 11978: 31979: 21980: 21982: 31983: 11988: 11989: 11990: 11992: 11993: 11996: 12002: 12010: 12014: 119722026peak 1973 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Donald J. Wylie v. The Marley Company891 F.2d 1463 (10th Cir. 1989)
  2. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Independent Stockholders Committee354 F. Supp. 895 (D. Del. 1973)
  3. Edelman v. Salomon559 F. Supp. 1178 (D. Del. 1983)
  4. Kennecott Copper Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation584 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1978)
  5. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.561 P.2d 1299 (Idaho 1977)
  6. Bertoglio v. Texas International Co.488 F. Supp. 630 (D. Del. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Kaufman v. Allemang70 F. Supp. 3d 682 (D. Del. 2014)
  2. Kurz v. Holbrook989 A.2d 140 (Del. Ch. 2010)
  3. Murray v. Conseco, Inc.766 N.E.2d 38 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002)
  4. Ahn v. Lee471 S.E.2d 38 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996)
  5. In re Westinghouse Securities Litigation832 F. Supp. 989 (W.D. Pa. 1993)
  6. In re Delmarva Securities Litigation794 F. Supp. 1293 (D. Del. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dillon v. Berg, 326 F. Supp. 1214 (D. Del. 1971) 46

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list