TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Jack Braton Tomlin

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jack Braton TOMLIN, Appellant

United States v. Tomlin, 454 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 18, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1417
Judges
Ely, Hufstedler, Per Curiam, Taylor
Citations
454 F.2d 176

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

In a seven-count indictment, Tomlin was charged with offenses proscribed by the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841 (a) and 5861(d). He pleaded guilty to one of the counts and now appeals from the judgment of conviction. His contention is that the pertinent provisions of the Act are unconstitutional, infringing upon his alleged right to bear arms under the Second Amendment and upon powers reserved to the States under the Tenth Amendment.

The two arguments made by Tomlin are undermined by controlling precedent.

See, e. g., United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601 , 91 S.Ct. 1112 , 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971); United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 , 59 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed. 1206 (1939); Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U.S. 506 , 57 S.Ct. 554 , 81 L.Ed. 772 (1936).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 11995: 22021: 119762026peak 1995 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Glen Ray Birmley529 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1976)
  2. UNITED STATES of America v. Gabriel Valdez ANDAVERDE64 F.3d 1305 (9th Cir. 1995)
  3. United States v. Edwin Dale McClain61 F.3d 913 (9th Cir. 1995)
  4. Roe 1 v. United StatesNo. 1:19-cv-00270 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2021)

Most recent

  1. Roe 1 v. United StatesNo. 1:19-cv-00270 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2021)
  2. UNITED STATES of America v. Gabriel Valdez ANDAVERDE64 F.3d 1305 (9th Cir. 1995)
  3. United States v. Edwin Dale McClain61 F.3d 913 (9th Cir. 1995)
  4. United States v. Glen Ray Birmley529 F.2d 103 (6th Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601 (1971) 545
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) 435
Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U.S. 506 (1937) 185

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list