TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Troy C. Burroughs v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

Troy C. BURROUGHS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee

Burroughs v. Wainwright, 454 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 26, 1972
Docket
No. 71-2619
Judges
Wisdom, Coleman, Simpson
Citations
454 F.2d 11651972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11624

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the petition of a Florida state prisoner for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

Appellant is currently serving a five year sentence for larceny of an automobile, having been convicted upon trial by jury. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in Burroughs v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 159 . A motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 1.850, Fla.R.Crim.P., 33 F.S.A., was denied. Burroughs v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 781 .

In his habeas petition filed below appellant enumerates some 36 grounds for relief. A review of the records of proceedings in the state *1166 courts reveals that state remedies have not been exhausted as to all issues raised. Those allegations concerning double jeopardy, police brutality, mental coercion, and non-sequestration of witnesses have not been presented any state court. To avoid piecemeal litigation this Court has consistently required that state remedies be exhausted as to all issues raised in a federal habeas corpus petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ; Meacham v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 187 ; Garrett v. State of Texas, 5th Cir. 1970, 435 F.2d 709 ; Harrison v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1970, 424 F.2d 633 ; Wheeler v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1969, 407 F.2d 816 .

Since the record before this Court shows that the appellant has failed to avail himself of post-conviction remedies open to him under Florida law, i. e. filing a Rule 1.850 motion in his sentencing court, we believe that the ruling of the district court is correct. See Johnson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F.2d 387 .

The judgment below is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 21973: 21974: 11975: 11978: 119722026peak 1972 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Wheeler v. Beto, 407 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1969) 33
Burroughs v. State, 221 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969) 22
Linnus Harrison v. Wainwright, 424 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1970) 21
Meacham v. Beto, 451 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971) 2
Johnson v. Wainwright, 448 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1971) 1
Burroughs v. State, 235 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list