TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William Caldwell v. William H

Caldwell v. William H, 456 F.2d 685 (8th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 12, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1296
Citations
456 F.2d 6851972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10136

Opinion

456 F.2d 685

William CALDWELL, Appellee, v. William H. KAISER, Jr., Appellant. William CALDWELL, Appellant, v. William H. KAISER, Jr., Appellee.

Nos. 71-1296, 71-1327.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 1972. Decided April 12, 1972.

Steven Z. Lange, Katz, Taube, Lange & Frommelt, and A. Larry Katz, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant Kaiser.

Samuel L. Hanson, Briggs & Morgan, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee Caldwell.

Before GIBSON, HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

William H. Kaiser, Jr., appeals from a judgment against him for common law fraud, conversion, breach of trust, and violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 78j), and Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. Sec. 240.10b-5). The judgment against Kaiser was (1) for the sum of $50,400, with interest thereon at 6 percent per annum from November 15, 1968, (2) for 13,900 shares of the common stock of Special Transportation Services, Inc., and (3) for costs and disbursements. On appeal, Kaiser contends that the District Court erred by incorrectly calculating damages, and by denying his motions for amended findings and for a new trial. Caldwell cross appeals contending that the trial court erred in awarding him 13,900 shares of stock rather than the market value of the shares at the time of conversion.

2

We are convinced that the record adequately supports the trial court's findings of fact. The trial court also properly denied Kaiser's motions and correctly computed damages.

3

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list