United States v. William Randolph, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William RANDOLPH, Jr., AKA Clarence Randolph, AKA Bobby Moore, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.
We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.
On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.