TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dedorise Daniel Doyal v. United States

Dedorise Daniel DOYAL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee

Doyal v. United States, 456 F.2d 1292 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 21, 1972
Docket
No. 72-1076
Judges
Bell, Dyer, Clark
Citations
456 F.2d 12921972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10600

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of Doyal to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 . We affirm.

Doyal was convicted upon trial by jury on a four-count indictment charging him with illegal importation of 750 grams of cocaine and with assault of federal customs officers. This Court affirmed the conviction in United States v. Doyal, 5 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 271 . In his motion to vacate sentence Doyal alleges that the record of the proceedings in the trial court was incomplete.

Doyal was represented at his trial by two privately retained attorneys.

*1293 The record and transcript were prepared at Doyal’s expense. The responsibility for directing whether the entire record was to be prepared rested with Doyal’s counsel. In addition, Doyal did not allege what was omitted from the transcript or how he was prejudiced by any omission. He has wholly failed to allege upon what grounds relief could be granted. Smith v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 449 F.2d 176 . Instead, he contends that a complete record should be prepared at Government expense to allow him to determine what was omitted and to further determine whether he was prejudiced thereby. An indigent has no absolute right to a free copy of his transcript merely to search for possible defects. Colbert v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1971, 439 F.2d 1130 ; Bennett v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 437 F.2d 1210 ; Skinner v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 434 F.2d 1036 . The judgment is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Skinner v. United States, 434 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1970) 18
Bennett v. United States, 437 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1971) 9
United States v. Dedorise Daniel Doyal, No. 30378 Summary Calendar, 437 F.2d 271 (5th Cir. 1971) 2
Smith v. United States, 449 F.2d 176 (5th Cir. 1971) 2
Colbert v. Beto, 439 F.2d 1130 (5th Cir. 1971) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list