TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thomas E. Young v. United States

Thomas E. YOUNG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Young v. United States, 457 F.2d 800 (8th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 27, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1617
Judges
Gibson, Heaney, Per Curiam, Ross
Citations
457 F.2d 8001972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10494

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case was brought by petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside the sentence imposed upon him in 1952 following a plea of guilty to charges alleging interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. Young’s attack on his conviction and sentence is one of many 2255 motions we have considered.

1

The trial court in this case determined that petitioner’s claims were based essentially on the same grounds previously raised and denied by this Court. His claim that the convicting court did not comply with Rule 11 in accepting his guilty plea was refuted by this Court in Young v. United States, 423 F.2d 677 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 915 , 90 S.Ct. 2221 , 26 L.Ed.2d 574 (1970); and his claim that he was not properly advised of his right to counsel was fully answered in Young v. United States, 228 F.2d 693 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 913 , 76 S.Ct. 704 , 100 L.Ed. 1447 (1956). The trial court then denied the motion on the basis of that part of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 which provides: “The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion *801 for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.”

We have carefully considered the allegations of the petitioner in light of the earlier cases and agree with Judge Davies that the points raised in this ease are essentially the same as those raised and decided by us on earlier motions. The judgment is affirmed.

1

. Young v. United States, 228 F.2d 698 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 913 , 76 S.Ct. 704 , 100 L.Ed. 1447 (1956) ; 246 F.2d 901 (8th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 917 , 78 S.Ct. 348 , 2 L.Ed.2d 277 (1958) ; 259 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 917 , 79 S.Ct. 595 , 3 L.Ed.2d 579 (1959) ; 274 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1960), aff’d sub nom. Payne v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 761 , 81 S.Ct. 1670 , 6 L.Ed.2d 853 (1961) ; 300 F.Supp. 373 (D.N.D.1969), aff’d 423 F.2d 677 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 915 , 90 S.Ct. 2221 , 26 L.Ed.2d 574 (1970).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11973: 11974: 11989: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 11

DepthCaseCited by
Turner v. Ellis, 351 U.S. 913 (1956) 5
Payne v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 761 (1961) 5
Michel v. Indus. Accident Comm'n of Cal., 355 U.S. 917 (1958) 19
Willard v. Hatcher, 399 U.S. 904 (1970) 5
Young v. United States, 423 F.2d 677 (8th Cir. 1970) 3
Artype v. Zappulla, 228 F.2d 695 (2d Cir. 1956) 21
Young v. United States, 274 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1960) 18
Young v. United States, 246 F.2d 901 (8th Cir. 1957) 11
Young v. United States, 228 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1956) 8
Young v. United States, 259 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1958) 8
Young v. United States, 300 F. Supp. 373 (D.N.D. 1969) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list