United States v. Joseph Waters
UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph WATERS, Appellant
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:
Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction of knowingly and wilfully making a false statement in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001 . His major contention is that any falsification of records was directed to the Urban League of Philadelphia, a contractor with the Department of Labor, and not to a government agency itself. We find this appeal to be without merit. See *806 Ebeling v. United States, 248 F.2d 429 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Emerling v. United States, 355 U.S. 907 , 78 S.Ct. 334 , 2 L.Ed.2d 261 (1957).
The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(false statements made to Urban League of Philadelphia, a contractor with the United States Department of Labor)
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Canel
- United States v. Starnes
- United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy Jones
- United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph Demio
- United States v. Joseph D
- United States v. William P. Catena, M.D.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.