TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Michael J. MABIN v. LEAR SIEGLER, INC.

4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 687, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7741 Michael J. Mabin v. Lear Siegler, Inc.

Mabin v. Lear Siegler, Inc., 457 F.2d 806 (6th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 22, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1697
Judges
McCree, Kent, McAllister
Citations
457 F.2d 8064 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 77414 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 6871972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10575

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the District Court, after a trial without a jury, awarding damages to the plaintiff-appellee and against the defendant-appellant for violation of Title 7, § 703(a) (1) Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. 2000e-2(a).(l).

After a three-day trial the District Judge concluded that the appellee had established by competent evidence the existence of racially discriminatory practices with respect to appellee’s employment by the appellant. The appellant complains that the trial court relied upon erroneous statistics. The record shows that the statistical information used was taken from a document prepared by the appellant. The trial court was never advised as to any alleged error in the statistical information relied upon.

We recognize that statistical information may be an acceptable method for determining the existence or absence of racially prejudicial employment practices, Jones v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 431 F.2d 245 (10th Cir. 1970); Parham v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 433 F.2d 421 (8th Cir. 1970), but on this record we are not persuaded that the statistical information was the controlling evidence upon which the trial court relied in reaching its conclusion.

Appellant also complains that the trial court should have credited the testimony of the witnesses for the appellant as opposed to the witnesses for the appellee. The determination of the credibility of witnesses is confided solely to the trier *807 of the facts and should not be disturbed on appeal except in unusual circumstances.

Upon examination of the entire record we cannot say that the findings of fact of the trial judge are “clearly erroneous” within the meaning of Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1973: 21974: 11975: 21979: 11980: 11982: 21983: 219732026peak 1973 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Parham v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 433 F.2d 421 (8th Cir. 1970) 386
Jones v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 431 F.2d 245 (10th Cir. 1970) 159

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list