TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Laszlo Habda v. Jack Wysocker, Esq

Laszlo HABDA, Appellant, v. Jack WYSOCKER, Esq.

Laszlo Habda v. Wysocker, 458 F.2d 537 (3d Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 1, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1428
Judges
Hastie, Gibbons, Becker
Citations
458 F.2d 5371972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9818
Cited by 2 Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343 . On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 2 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 11985: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Joseph Carl Brown, Jr. v. Richard P. Joseph, Esquire463 F.2d 1046 (3d Cir. 1972)
  2. Commonwealth v. Carsia491 A.2d 237 (Pa. 1985)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. Carsia491 A.2d 237 (Pa. 1985)
  2. Joseph Carl Brown, Jr. v. Richard P. Joseph, Esquire463 F.2d 1046 (3d Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir. 1972) 40

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list