United States v. Scat, Inc.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. SCAT, INC., Appellant
Opinion
*311 PER CURIAM.
Scat, Inc., pleaded guilty to making a false statement to an agent of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . The district court 1
sentenced the company to 5 years probation and ordered it to pay $545,161.20 in restitution. Scat challenges the restitution on appeal, arguing that it contravenes the holding of Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 412-13 , 110 S.Ct. 1979 , 109 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990) (under Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, restitution is limited to loss caused by conduct underlying count of conviction). This argument fails because Hughey was superseded by the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, which authorizes restitution for every victim harmed in the course of the defendant’s scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, not just the offense of conviction.
See United States v. Jackson, 155 F.3d 942, 949-50 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1059 , 119 S.Ct. 627 , 142 L.Ed.2d 565 (1998).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
1
. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.