United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso Eduardo NINOV, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Ninov, 458 F.2d 1360 (5th Cir. 1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: June 1, 1972
Docket: No. 72-1062
Judges: Bell, Dyer, Clark
Citations: 458 F.2d 1360

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed.

See Local Rule 21. The statements of Armenteros inculpating Ninov made during the commission of the crime were properly admitted into evidence, given the independent evidence of concert of action between the two. Migliore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 786 ; United States v. Williams, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 642 ; United States v. Bey, 3 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 188 . In addition, there is no merit in the assignments of error based on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 4

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of Am., Afl-Cio, Local 990, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)	2,432
	United States v. Stevenson Stone Bey, Frederick Howard, Stevenson Stone Bey, 437 F.2d 188 (3d Cir. 1971)	42
	United States v. Williams, 435 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1970)	35
	Richard John Migliore v. United States of Am., Jacqueline Mingo v. United States, 409 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1969)	6

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list