TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Charles T. Sanders v. Independent School District No. I-2, of Kiowa County, Oklahoma

Charles T. SANDERS, Appellant, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I-2, OF KIOWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, Et Al., Appellees

Sanders v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. I-2, of Kiowa Cnty., Okla., 459 F.2d 51 (10th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 11, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1512
Judges
Lewis, Holloway, Mewilliams
Citations
459 F.2d 511972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9632

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Alleging a civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (3) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , plaintiff, a school teacher, brought this action for damages against his employer school district and various school officials claiming damages for wrongful discharge from his employment. Plaintiff alleges that on April 3, 1970, he entered into a one-year teaching contract and was wrongfully discharged on September 28, 1970, because defendants “dislike the fact that the plaintiff grew a mustache; they requested that he re *52 move it; he refused; and they fired him.” The trial court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction.

The judgment of dismissal is manifestly correct. Plaintiff’s complaint asserts nothing more than a breach of contract claim, alleges no claim to diversity jurisdiction, negates specifically any claim to a constitutional right to wear a mustache, and recites no involvement of a substantial federal question. Adelt v. Richmond School District, 9 Cir., 439 F.2d 718 .

And see Freeman v. Flake, 10 Cir., 448 F.2d 258 . The Civil Rights Act cannot be used as a jurisdictional subterfuge for traditional lawsuits. Oklahoma High School Athletic Ass’n v. Bray, 10 Cir., 321 F.2d 269 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1973: 11977: 11979: 12014: 12020: 12023: 12026: 119732026peak 1973 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Davison v. Grant Thornton LLP582 F. App'x 773 (10th Cir. 2014)
  2. Mrs. Concha Lopez v. Roger Luginbill, Superintendent483 F.2d 486 (10th Cir. 1973)
  3. Doe v. Sullivan472 F. Supp. 975 (W.D. Tex. 1979)
  4. Phillips v. Fisher445 F. Supp. 552 (D. Kan. 1977)
  5. Atrisco Heritage Foundation v. New Mexico Commission for Community VolunteerismNo. 1:18-cv-00937 (D.N.M. Mar. 30, 2020)
  6. Gonzales v. CashmanNo. 1:23-cv-00399 (D.N.M. July 25, 2023)

Most recent

  1. Belinda Robertson v. Theodore Markowski and Markowski-Ruvalcaba Law Firm LLCNo. 2:26-cv-01572 (D.N.M. Sept. 25, 2026)
  2. Gonzales v. CashmanNo. 1:23-cv-00399 (D.N.M. July 25, 2023)
  3. Atrisco Heritage Foundation v. New Mexico Commission for Community VolunteerismNo. 1:18-cv-00937 (D.N.M. Mar. 30, 2020)
  4. Davison v. Grant Thornton LLP582 F. App'x 773 (10th Cir. 2014)
  5. Doe v. Sullivan472 F. Supp. 975 (W.D. Tex. 1979)
  6. Phillips v. Fisher445 F. Supp. 552 (D. Kan. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Freeman v. Flake, 448 F.2d 258 (10th Cir. 1971) 64
Okla. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n v. Bray, 321 F.2d 269 (10th Cir. 1963) 51
Adelt v. Richmond Sch. Dist., 439 F.2d 718 (9th Cir. 1971) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list