Airlift International, Inc. v. United States of America
AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The single issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court, in a non-jury action brought to recover certain damages under an insurance contract, committed reversible error in refusing to admit certain expert testimony concerning the scope of the contract’s coverage. We need not decide whether the court’s ruling amounted to an abuse of discretion, for if it were, such error would be harmless in light of the remaining uncontested findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Cf.
Cain et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 460 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1972).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(fact of a mid-air collision between civilian and military aircraft over Republic of Vietnam during period of war was not sufficient to establish that loss resulted from a war risk rather than an aviation risk)
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.