TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. John Lee Bowen

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Lee BOWEN, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Bowen, 462 F.2d 347 (9th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: aff'd, Bowen v. United States, 422 U.S. 916 (1975). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 24, 1972
Docket
No. 72-1012
Judges
Merrill, Goodwin, Lydick
Citations
462 F.2d 347

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

John Lee Bowen appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for violation of 21 U.S.C.. 176(a) and 21 U.S.C. 331 (q) (3) (B) (smuggling and transporting smuggled marijuana and possession of depressant and stimulant drugs).

While searching Bowen’s rented camper for aliens, Immigration Officer Ort-meier first smelled and then found in the camper nearly 356 pounds of marijuana bricks of the type and packaged in the manner that usually comes from Mexico, along with backpacking equipment and burlap bags marked Product of Mexico. One hundred fifty-eight benzedrine tablets were found in the pocket of a jacket in the cab of the camper.

Questions raised on appeal are whether the search and seizure were lawful, whether there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that the marijuana had been unlawfully imported by appellant and whether appellant knew it had been unlawfully imported when he transported it.

The search and seizure were plainly lawful. The circumstantial evidence of knowledge of unlawful importation on Count 2 of the Indictment, though not overwhelming, was clearly sufficient to support the jury verdict. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the smuggling charge of Count 1 need not be reached since the sentences on Counts 1 and 2 were identical and concurrent. United States v. Aranda, 9th Cir., 1972, 457 F. 2d 761 .

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 21974: 21975: 11981: 119732026peak 1973 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Williams v. State403 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
  2. Bowen v. United States422 U.S. 916 (1975)
  3. United States v. John Lee Bowen500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Fuentes379 F. Supp. 1145 (S.D. Tex. 1974)
  5. Foerster v. United States413 U.S. 915 (1973)
  6. United States v. John Lee Bowen485 F.2d 1388 (9th Cir. 1973)

Most recent

  1. Williams v. State403 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
  2. Bowen v. United States422 U.S. 916 (1975)
  3. United States v. Fuentes379 F. Supp. 1145 (S.D. Tex. 1974)
  4. United States v. John Lee Bowen500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974)
  5. United States v. John Lee Bowen485 F.2d 1388 (9th Cir. 1973)
  6. Foerster v. United States413 U.S. 915 (1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Aranda, 457 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1972) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list