TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Leonard McIntosh

UNITED STATES of America v. Leonard McINTOSH, Appellant

United States v. McIntosh, 463 F.2d 250 (3d Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 3, 1972
Docket
No. 72-1323
Judges
Aldisert, Rosen, Hunter
Citations
463 F.2d 2501972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8622

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

Found guilty by a jury of robbing the Delaware Trust Company, 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), appellant raises as the sole question on this appeal that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence that the bank was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a crucial element of the crime charged. At trial, the Assistant Vice-President and Manager of the Wilmington Office of the Delaware Trust Company testified that he was custodian of the charters of the bank, and that on the critical date, March 14, 1969, the bank was a member of the F.D.I.C. His testimony was not contradicted.

We hold that the uncontradicted testimony was sufficient to sustain the government’s burden. United States v. Phillips, 427 F.2d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 108 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970); United States v. Safley, 408 F.2d 603, 605 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 983 , 89 S.Ct. 2147 , 23 L.Ed.2d 772 (1969).

The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1975: 11979: 11980: 11981: 11987: 11991: 12006: 12009: 12010: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Henrich Barel939 F.2d 26 (3d Cir. 1991)
  2. United States v. Grady James Maner611 F.2d 107 (5th Cir. 1980)
  3. United States v. Darrell C. Baldwin644 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1981)
  4. UNITED STATES of America v. James Regan DARRELL828 F.2d 644 (10th Cir. 1987)
  5. United States v. Susan Doris Phillips606 F.2d 884 (9th Cir. 1979)
  6. United States v. Nikita Hampton464 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2006)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Paris Carney383 F. App'x 209 (3d Cir. 2010)
  2. United States v. Humbert336 F. App'x 132 (3d Cir. 2009)
  3. United States v. Nikita Hampton464 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2006)
  4. United States v. Henrich Barel939 F.2d 26 (3d Cir. 1991)
  5. UNITED STATES of America v. James Regan DARRELL828 F.2d 644 (10th Cir. 1987)
  6. United States v. Darrell C. Baldwin644 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Dillard v. Family Court, 395 U.S. 825 (1969) 128
United States v. Jess Ross Safley, United States of Am. v. Augustus Butler, 408 F.2d 603 (4th Cir. 1969) 47
United States v. Phillips, 427 F.2d 1035 (9th Cir. 1970) 30

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list