TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Peter v. Arrien

Margaret Kistler Peter v. Phillip F. Arrien, Deputy Commissioner United States Employees Compensation Commission, Third Compensation District and Public Contracting Co., Intervening

Peter v. Arrien, 463 F.2d 252 (3d Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 26, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1529
Citations
463 F.2d 252

Opinion

463 F.2d 252

Margaret Kistler PETER et al. v. Phillip F. ARRIEN, Deputy Commissioner United States Employees Compensation Commission, Third Compensation District and Public Contracting Co., Intervening Defendant, Appellant.

No. 71-1529.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued April 11, 1972. Decided May 12, 1972. As Amended July 26, 1972.

Laurence Reich, Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, Newark, N. J., for appellant.

Milton M. Borowsky, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before HASTIE, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

The district court held that the widow and dependent children of Ralph Peter were entitled to compensation for his death under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. Sec. 901 . This appeal challenges that decision.

2

Peter was employed by a contractor engaged in the demolition of a bridge over navigable water of the Delaware River. He drowned when a crane he was operating on a temporary causeway, built for the purposes of this project from the shore out into the stream, toppled into the river.

3

For reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, 325 F.Supp. 1361 , we are satisfied that the circumstances of Peter's employment and death bring the present claim within the coverage of the Longshoremen's Act and that, in the circumstances of this case, the acceptance of payments under a state compensation statute did not preclude recovery under the federal statute. 1 4

The judgment will be affirmed.

1

Recovery was limited to the amount by which benefits under the federal statute exceed those allowed under the state statute

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 119792026peak 1979 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fusco v. Perini North River Associates601 F.2d 659 (2d Cir. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Fusco v. Perini North River Associates601 F.2d 659 (2d Cir. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Peter v. Arrien, 325 F. Supp. 1361 (E.D. Pa. 1971) 10
Peter v. Arrien, 463 F.2d 252 (3d Cir. 1972) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list