Judy K. Blanton v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
Judy K. BLANTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, we are of the view that there was no genuine issue of fact necessitating a trial. Furthermore, for the reasons explicated by the district court, we agree with its conclusion that the Company was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(c). The opinion of the district court, 345 F.Supp. 168 , is adopted as the opinion of this Court;
1
Affirmed.
1
. The trial court did not consider the contention made on appeal that the Company extended credit to the insured in the full amount of the overdue and unpaid premiums. There is no evidence in the record that would support such a contention. We therefore consider this specification of error as frivolous.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.