TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Plotner v. Resor

James F. Plotner, Jr., Sp. 4, United States Army v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army, and John C. F. Tillson, Iii, Commanding General, Fort Gordon, Georgia

Plotner v. Resor, 463 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 18, 1972
Docket
No. 31030
Citations
463 F.2d 422

Opinion

463 F.2d 422

James F. PLOTNER, Jr., Sp. 4, United States Army, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Stanley R. RESOR, Secretary of the Army, and John C. F. Tillson, III, Commanding General, Fort Gordon, Georgia, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 31030.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 1972.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia; Alexander A. Lawrence, Chief Judge.

William T. Morton, Asst. U. S. Atty., R. Jackson B. Smith, Jr., U. S. Atty., Barnee C. Baxter, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., for respondents-appellants.

Peter E. Rindskopf, Howard Moore, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., John H. Ruffin, Augusta, Ga., for petitioner-appellee.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The court has heretofore put this case en banc on its own motion. On the facts made known to the Court the cause has become moot since the granting of rehearing en banc. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the panel decision, 1971, 446 F.2d 1066 is to have no precedential value.

2

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 119762026peak 1976 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Henry Samuel Atkins, Jr.528 F.2d 1352 (5th Cir. 1976)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Henry Samuel Atkins, Jr.528 F.2d 1352 (5th Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list