TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Carlus Phillips

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Carlus L. PHILLIPS, Appellant

United States v. Phillips, 361 F. App'x 702 (8th Cir. 2010)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 19, 2010
Docket
No. 09-2403
Judges
Murphy, Bye, Strom
Citations
361 F. App'x 702
Status
Unpublished

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In 2003, Carlus Phillips pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base (crack cocaine) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). The district court 2

sentenced him to 252 months of imprisonment, a sentence which fell near the top of the applicable Guidelines range of 210-262 months. In 2009, Phillips moved for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c) based on Amendment 706 to the Guidelines, which reduced the base offense level for crack cocaine offenses by two levels. The amended Guidelines range for Phillips’s crack cocaine offense thus became 168-210 months. The district court 3

resentenced Phillips to 202 months, selecting a sentence that fell near the top of the amended Guidelines range, proportionally consistent with the original sentence of 252 months.

Phillips appeals his amended sentence contending the district court erred by failing to elaborate on its reasons for selecting a sentence near the high end of the amended Guidelines range, and by failing to consider or explain its application of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a).

The district court’s selection of a sentence within the amended Guidelines range that was proportionally consistent with the original sentence, coupled with the discussion of the § 3553(a) factors conducted in the original sentencing proceeding, sufficiently explain the amended sentence.

See United States v. Clark, 563 F.3d 722, 725 (8th Cir.2009) (affirming a sentence amended pursuant to § 3582(c) which was near the high end of the amended Guidelines range, where the original sentence was also at the high end of the Guidelines *704 range, and where the district court at the original sentencing hearing provided an adequate explanation of the § 3553(a) factors and gave the reasons for selecting its sentence).

We affirm.

2

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

3

.The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2010: 120102026peak 2010 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Burrell622 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2010)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Burrell622 F.3d 961 (8th Cir. 2010)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Clark, 563 F.3d 722 (8th Cir. 2009) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list