TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Richard Carter Newman v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director of Florida Division of Corrections

Richard Carter NEWMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director of Florida Division of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee

Newman v. Wainwright, 464 F.2d 615 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 31, 1972
Docket
No. 71-1548
Judges
Gewin, Goldberg, Dyer
Citations
464 F.2d 6151972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8145

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

By his habeas corpus petition Newman contends that his death sentence for rape should be set aside because the voir dire examination of the jury panel was not recorded, thus foreclosing to him proof that prospective jurors might have been excused in violation of the precepts of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 1968, 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 . Secondly, he urges that the imposition of the death penalty amounts to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

The intervening decision in Furman v. Georgia, 1972, 408 U.S. 238 , 92 S.Ct. 2726 , 33 L.Ed.2d 346 and its companion cases holding that the death penalty as imposed under the Georgia and Texas statutes is cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment is controlling. There, as in Florida, 1

the death penalty has been inequitably, arbitrarily, and infrequently imposed and thus “constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments”. 408 U. S. at 239 , 92 S.Ct. at 2727 .

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to grant the writ if the state of Florida should fail or refuse within a reasonable period of time to reduce Newman’s sentence to a period not exceeding life imprisonment.

2

Reversed and remanded with directions.

1

. F.S.A. § 794.01 2

. Our disposition of the case makes it unnecessary for us to consider Newman’s contention concerning the lack of the voir dire transcript.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11973: 41976: 119722026peak 1973 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) 3,595
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968) 3,527

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list