Tommie Heads, Jr. v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Tommie HEADS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Tommie Heads, Jr., appeals from an order of the District Court denying his petition for habeas corpus relief. We affirm.
In his petition appellant raised a number of grounds which included coerced confession, lack of adequate counsel, and the admission of prejudicial evidence. The District Court found no ground amounted to a denial of constitutional rights. The sole issue on appeal is whether the admission at his state trial for murder of testimony concerning two other murders, for which he was then charged and to which he later pled guilty, was so prejudicial that it amounted to a denial of due process.
Under Texas law, the evidence concerning the other killings which happened as an integral part of the same occurrence as the murder for which appellant was on trial, was admissible to show intent, Ellisor v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 117 , 282 S.W.2d 393 (1955); malice, Moss v. State, 364 S.W.2d 389 (Tex.Crim.App.1963); and motive, Moses v. State, 168 Tex.Crim.R. 409, 328 S.W.2d 885 (1959). We further note that the record of the state trial, which was before the federal habeas court, discloses that the jury was given appropriate limiting instructions as requested by appellant’s counsel.
See Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 560-562 , 87 S.Ct. 648, 651-653 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967).
As a general rule, questions involving the admission of evidence are not subject to review by a federal court in a habeas corpus proceeding initiated by a state prisoner unless that is an error of such magnitude as to deny fundamental fairness to the criminal trial. Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 113-114 , 88 S.Ct. 258, 261 , 19 L.Ed.2d 319 (1967); United States ex rel. Harris v. Illinois, 457 F.2d 191, 198 (7th Cir. 1972); Williams v. Wainwright, 427 F.2d 921 (5th Cir. 1970); Nees v. Culbertson, 406 F.2d 621 (5th Cir. 1969). Without intending to enunciate an all inclusive rule, we hold that the evidence of the other connected murders admitted here, followed by a proper instruction to the jury on the limited purposes for which the evidence may be “considered, did not infringe upon the fairness of Head’s trial. Spencer v. Texas, supra; Gephart v. Beto, 441 F.2d 319 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 404 U.S. 966 , 92 S.Ct. 342 , 30 L.Ed.2d 286 (1971).
The judgment of the district court denying the writ of habeas corpus is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(evidence of two other murders to establish intent or motive)
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Frank Hills v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
- Harry J. Manning v. Jimmy H. Rose, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary
- Finis Smith Blankenship v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director of Texas Department of Corrections
- Roberto Debenedictis and Vincent Carola v. Louie L. Wainwright and the Attorney General of the State of Florida
- Charles "Red" Warden v. Donald Wyrick, Warden
- Hollis Earl Woods v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.