George v. Christman, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Christman & Company v
George v. Christman, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Christman & Company v. Maristella Compania Naviera, Third-Party v. Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., Third-Party
Opinion
468 F.2d 620
George V. CHRISTMAN et al., Co-partners doing business under the name and style of Christman & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARISTELLA COMPANIA NAVIERA, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOYD, WEIR & SEWELL, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86, Docket 72-1376.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 16, 1972. Decided Oct. 16, 1972.
Nicholas J. Healy, Jr., New York City (Healy & Baillie, William F. Losquadro, New York City, of counsel), for defendant, third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Edward L. Smith, New York City (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
R. Glenn Bauer, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellee.
Before MANSFIELD, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm the judgment of the district court upon the carefully considered opinion of Judge Brieant, reported at 349 F.Supp. 845 (S.D.N.Y.1971).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.