United States v. Scott Leisner and Steven Zatsky
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott LEISNER and Steven Zatsky, Defendants-Appellants
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Appellants were convicted of violation of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846. The sole contention on appeal is that the Act is unconstitutional because it fails to require proof of a specific connection between the prohibited drugs and interstate commerce as a prerequisite for conviction. This identical contention has been considered and rejected by us several times. See United States v. Lopez, 5 Cir., 1972, 459 F.2d 949 ; United States v. Lane et *337 al., 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 343 ; United States v. Lopez, et al., 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 499 ; United States v. Mather, 5 Cir., 1972, 465 F.2d 1035 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.