TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Edward Eugene Brown v. U. S. Attorney General

Edward Eugene BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL Et Al., Respondents-Appellees

Brown v. U. S. Attorney Gen., 469 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 15, 1972
Docket
No. 72-3020
Judges
Gewin, Ainsworth, Simpson
Citations
469 F.2d 6971972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6267

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellant having failed to file a brief, this appeal is referred to us under the provisions of Local Rule 9(c)(2).

1

The record reveals that the appeal is entirely lacking in merit and we therefore dismiss.

2

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981 .

2

. See Local Rule 20; Eisenhardt v. United States, 5th Cir. 1972, 461 F.2d 1267 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Kimbrough v. Beto, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969) 164
Eisenhardt v. United States, 461 F.2d 1267 (5th Cir. 1972) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list