TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vivian Calhoun v. Ed S. Cook

Vivian CALHOUN Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ed S. COOK Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Calhoun v. Cook, 469 F.2d 1067 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 24, 1972
Docket
No. 72-2453
Judges
Wisdom, Thornberry, Clark
Citations
469 F.2d 10671972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6572

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

On October 21, 1971, this Court entered an interim order in the prior appeal of these school desegregation proceedings, 451 F.2d 583 ; (a) vacating the order of the district court which dismissed this action as of January 1, 1972; (b) remanding the cause for the limited purpose of allowing plaintiffs-appellants a reasonable opportunity to present and support an alternate and superior plan for desegregation of the student body of the Atlanta Public School System; and (c) providing for other and subsequent proceedings. On June 23, 1972, the district court certified to this Court its findings and conclusions which had been entered on June 8, 1972, rejecting the plan submitted by plaintiffs-appellants and again declaring the Atlanta Public School System unitary. The present appeal eventuated from this order.

As a result of a pre-hearing conference set by this Court on September 26, 1972, the parties indicated that a possibility existed for an agreed settlement of this litigation. Based upon such indication, this Court’s order of October 6, 1972, was- issued to authorize and guide such settlement negotiations. Although one settlement proposal was developed and filed on November 17, 1972, class representation complications negated this Court’s acceptance of that proposal. Further appellate proceedings at this juncture are deemed inappropriate.

The findings and conclusions of the district court determining that the Atlanta Public School System as now operated is non-discriminatory and unitary are again vacated. This cause is REMANDED to the district court with directions to forthwith: (1) Hold such hearings as may be required to enable the Court to determine the present status of the class or classes in this litigation and the status of legal representation thereof under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(d), in the light of claims now made by certain of the named plaintiffs in this Court; and (2) enter an appropriate order requiring the Atlanta Public School System to prepare and submit to the district court a comprehensive desegregation plan covering student assignments in accordance with the guidelines contained in this Court’s interim order of October 6, 1972; and faculty and staff assignments in accordance with the dictates of Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 419 F.2d 1211 (5 Cir. 1970). Particular attention to teacher desegregation is required in light of announcements by counsel for the defendants-appellees in this Court that this Court’s prior order on this phase of this case has never been fully implemented.

This remand shall in no wise affect the final two paragraphs of our prior mandate of October 21, 1971.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11973: 11977: 219722026peak 1977 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vivian Calhoun v. Ed S. Cook487 F.2d 680 (5th Cir. 1973)
  2. In re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust Litigation552 F.2d 1088 (5th Cir. 1977)
  3. Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George's County355 F. Supp. 1051 (D. Maryland 1972)
  4. Hitt v. Nissan Motor Co.552 F.2d 1088 (5th Cir. 1977)

Most recent

  1. In re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust Litigation552 F.2d 1088 (5th Cir. 1977)
  2. Hitt v. Nissan Motor Co.552 F.2d 1088 (5th Cir. 1977)
  3. Vivian Calhoun v. Ed S. Cook487 F.2d 680 (5th Cir. 1973)
  4. Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George's County355 F. Supp. 1051 (D. Maryland 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1122, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9412 Derek Jerome Singleton v. Jackson Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., No. 26285, 419 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1970) 99
Calhoun v. Cook, 451 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1971) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list