Robert O. Brenham v. Southern Pacific Company v. Sutton's Steel & Supply, Inc.
Robert O. BRENHAM, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUTTON'S STEEL & SUPPLY, INC., Et Al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
On the basis of the district court’s well-reasoned opinion, reported at 328 F.Supp. 119 , on the issue of whether appellant was entitled to the right of contribution from appellees in the instant ease, we affirm.
Cf.
United States v. Moore, 3d Cir. 1972, 469 F.2d 788 . See also Phillips v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, W.D.La. 1963, 219 F.Supp. 420 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Campione v. Soden
- Youell v. Maddox
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,737 Browning Seed, Inc. v. Johnnie Bayles
- Cullen v. Margiotta
- Jackson v. Tenneco Oil Co.
- Archie Armstrong v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, and Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Miller Cab Company, Inc., and New Hampshire Insurance Company, Third Party
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.