Raymond M. Hamilton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, (Two Cases)
Opinion
469 F.2d 1394
Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).
Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1972. Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.
Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.
2
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.