TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Larry P. High Pine v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Warden of Montana State Prison

Larry P. High PINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Warden of Montana State Prison, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees

Larry P. High Pine v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Warden of Mont. State Prison, 470 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 27, 1972
Docket
No. 71-2639
Judges
Duniway, Ely, Per Curiam, Wright
Citations
470 F.2d 7211972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6554

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted in Montana state court on his plea of guilty of second degree murder, entered in 1960. He appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He has exhausted his state remedies.

See In re High Pine’s Petition, 1964, 143 Mont. 453 , 391 P.2d 690 ; Petition of High Pine, 1969, 153 Mont. 464 , 457 P.2d 912 ; Petition of High Pine, 1970, 156 Mont. 300 , 478 P.2d 859 .

1

In the petition before us appellant makes four claims. First, appellant argues that he did not voluntarily waive his right to counsel at his arraignment, or at a coroner’s inquest, at which he neither testified nor asked questions. Nothing detrimental to him happened on either occasion. At the time when he was called upon to plead, and thereafter, he had counsel. No prejudice is shown. Favors v. Eyman, 9 Cir., 1972, 466 F.2d 1325 (1972).

*722 Second, appellant argues that he did not voluntarily waive his right to a preliminary hearing. He did waive it, but without counsel. There was in 1960 no right to a preliminary hearing in Montana, and the state could have proceeded against appellant even if he had prevailed at such a hearing.

See State ex rel. Juhl v. District Court, 107 Mont. 309 , 84 P.2d 979 (1938); Rev.Code Mont. § 94-6125 (1947). Appellant cannot rely upon Coleman v. Alabama (1970), 399 U.S. 1 , 90 S.Ct. 1999 , 26 L.Ed.2d 387 ; it is not retroactive. Adams v. Illinois, (1972), 405 U.S. 278 , 92 S.Ct. 916 , 31 L.Ed.2d 202 .

Third, appellant argues that his plea was not voluntary because he did not have the assistance of counsel, and the plea was the product of a coerced confession. He did have competent counsel. The confession was never used. McMann v. Richardson, 1970, 397 U.S. 759 , 90 S.Ct. 1441 , 25 L.Ed.2d 763 , Knowles v. Gladden, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F.2d 761, 766 .

Fourth, appellant argues that he did not know the charge against him or the consequences of his plea. The record shows that he did know. In 1968, appellant wrote a letter to the state judge in which he said;

“Being faced with the charge of first degree murder and when the prosecuting attorney and Mr. Haines [sic] [appellant’s since-deceased attorney] offered to make me a deal to plead guilty to second degree murder and to take a twenty year sentence, I felt it was too tempting to turn down.”

Nor can appellant rely upon Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 and its progeny. It is not retroactive. Moss v. Craven, 9 Cir., 1970, 427 F.2d 139 . The district judge examined the entire state record and heard appellant’s testimony. He held that the plea was freely and voluntarily entered. We agree. Appellant got exactly what he bargained for.

Affirmed.

1

. In a prior petition to the District Court, denial of which we affirmed, High Pine v. Montana, 9 Cir., 1971, 439 F.2d 1093 , High Pine did not attack the validity of his 1960 conviction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11978: 11979: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In Matter of Little Light598 P.2d 572 (Mont. 1979)
  2. Oliphant v. Koehler451 F. Supp. 1305 (W.D. Mich. 1978)
  3. James Burchett v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden, Arizona State Penitentiary493 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1974)

Most recent

  1. In Matter of Little Light598 P.2d 572 (Mont. 1979)
  2. Oliphant v. Koehler451 F. Supp. 1305 (W.D. Mich. 1978)
  3. James Burchett v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden, Arizona State Penitentiary493 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 12

DepthCaseCited by
Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) 11,275
McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (1970) 4,509
Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) 1,413
Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 (1972) 235
State ex rel. Juhl v. Dist. Court, 84 P.2d 979 (Mont. 1938) 11
Petition of High Pine, 457 P.2d 912 (Mont. 1969) 10
In re High Pine's Petition, 391 P.2d 690 (Mont. 1964) 3
In re High Pine, 478 P.2d 859 (Mont. 1970) 2
Commodore William Moss v. Craven, 427 F.2d 139 (9th Cir. 1970) 37
Knowles v. Clarence T. Gladden,, Or. State Penitentiary, 378 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1967) 27
Favors v. Frank a.eyman,, Ariz. State Prison, 466 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1972) 22
Larry P. High Pine v. State of Mont. & W. J. Estelle, Jr., Warden of Mont. State Prison, 439 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1971) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list