TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bobby Ray Powers v. United States

Bobby Ray POWERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee

Powers v. United States, 470 F.2d 991 (5th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 18, 1972
Docket
No. 72-3221
Judges
Wisdom, Godbold, Roney
Citations
470 F.2d 9911972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6232

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellant pleaded guilty to Count Two of an indictment containing two numbered paragraphs. Paragraph 1 charged a co-defendant, Sanchez, with possession of counterfeit bills in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 . Paragraph 2 charged appellant and others with aiding and abetting the offense described in paragraph 1 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 , the aider and abettor statute. Appellant was sentenced to six years, subject to 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (a)(2).

By a § 2255 motion Powers seeks to have his sentence reduced on the theory he has been convicted and sentenced as both a principal and aider and abettor of the same offense. This is wholly without merit. The indictment charged him with only one offense. 18 U.S.C. § 2 does not define a crime but merely makes punishable as a principal one who aids and abets another in the commission of a substantive crime. United States v. Campbell, 426 F.2d 547 (2d Cir. 1970). The sentence given appellant was well within the maximum, of 15 years which he could have received.

Appellant claims that the records of parole authorities show him to be guilty of two offenses, one as principal and the other as aider and abettor, which might impose an obstacle to his chances for parole. While we doubt his conclusory allegation, if any such misapprehension should arise appellant can remedy it by furnishing to the authorities a copy of this opinion confirming that he has been convicted of only a single offense.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11978: 11979: 11980: 11987: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Paul v. Oates560 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1977)
  2. United States v. John P. Cowart595 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1979)
  3. United States v. Roy A. Walker621 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1980)
  4. United States v. Charles Kenneth Masson582 F.2d 961 (5th Cir. 1978)
  5. United States v. Karen Ruth Gordon and David R. Woodcock812 F.2d 965 (5th Cir. 1987)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Karen Ruth Gordon and David R. Woodcock812 F.2d 965 (5th Cir. 1987)
  2. United States v. Roy A. Walker621 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1980)
  3. United States v. John P. Cowart595 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1979)
  4. United States v. Charles Kenneth Masson582 F.2d 961 (5th Cir. 1978)
  5. United States v. Paul v. Oates560 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Campbell, 426 F.2d 547 (2d Cir. 1970) 72

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list