Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Trustee and v. Clyde R
In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Trustee and v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt and Edward M. Walsh, Trustee and v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt And
Opinion
470 F.2d 996 73-2 USTC P 9700
In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt. James H. RIGGS, Trustee and Appellant, v. Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee. Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and Appellant, v. Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and Appellee.
Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1972.
Burton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicksberg, Kushner & Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.
Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Lynn Anderson Koller, (argued), of Newmark & Koller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.
Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18 , 91 S.Ct. 113 , 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F. Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).
2
We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.