TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Victor Manuel Campos

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Manuel CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Campos, 471 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 20, 1972
Docket
No. 72-2050
Judges
Hufstedler, Trask, Anderson
Citations
471 F.2d 296

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Victor M. Campos appeals from a judgment of conviction for violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 , 960 and 963, illegal importation of a controlled substance, and for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. We affirm.

On December 15, 1971, appellant’s vehicle was referred to secondary inspection at the regular San Clemente checkpoint. When the agent approached the vehicle to ascertain citizenship of the occupants, he detected the odor of marihuana. A subsequent search of the vehicle revealed several concealed kilos of marihuana in the car.

The stop and the brief detention of the vehicle at an authorized immigration vehicle checkpoint were valid without regard to either an articulable basis for suspicion of illegal conduct or probable cause. United States v. Aranda, 457 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1972); Fernandez v. United States, 321 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1963). When the agent detected the odor of marihuana, he then had probable cause to conduct the search. Fumagalli v. United States, 429 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1970).

Campos argues that an observation of his car by different agents two hours before the checkpoint encounter provided the agents no foundation for a stop or detention. We do not reach the question because, even if he were right, the Government did not need that justification to validate the stop or the brief detention made in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 11974: 31975: 41981: 119732026peak 1975 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Cummings43 Cal. App. 3d 1008 (1974)
  2. Robbins v. California453 U.S. 420 (1981)
  3. United States v. John Lee Bowen500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Vernon Willis Bowman, Jr.487 F.2d 1229 (10th Cir. 1973)
  5. United States v. Gary Richard Lovenguth and Lynn Brian Lovenguth514 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1975)
  6. Porter v. State302 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Robbins v. California453 U.S. 420 (1981)
  2. United States v. Burrow396 F. Supp. 890 (D. Maryland 1975)
  3. United States v. Pagan395 F. Supp. 1052 (D.P.R. 1975)
  4. United States v. Pagán395 F. Supp. 1052 (D.P.R. 1975)
  5. United States v. Gary Richard Lovenguth and Lynn Brian Lovenguth514 F.2d 96 (9th Cir. 1975)
  6. People v. Cummings43 Cal. App. 3d 1008 (1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Fernandez v. United States, 321 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1963) 58
Fumagalli v. United States, 429 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1970) 20
United States v. Aranda, 457 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1972) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list