TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vernon M. Ellis v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Vernon M. ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elliott L. RICHARDSON, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, Defendant-Appellee

Ellis v. Richardson, 471 F.2d 720 (5th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 4, 1973
Docket
No. 72-2952
Judges
Thornberry, Coleman, Ingraham
Citations
471 F.2d 7201973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12325

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellant instituted this action in the district court seeking to review a denial of social security disability benefits. The district court issued an order of dismissal which was timely followed by appellant's Rule 59 motion 1

to reconsider. Such motion was denied. Appellant filed another motion to reconsider under Rule 59 based upon substantially the same grounds as urged in the earlier motion. The second motion was likewise denied.

*721 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a), appellant had sixty days from the entry of the order of dismissal to file a notice of appeal. The filing of the first Rule 59 motion terminated the running of the time for the appeal, but the second such motion based upon the same grounds did not.

In this case appellant had sixty days from the denial of his first Rule 59 motion in which to file notice of appeal. Having failed to do so, we are therefore without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his claim and accordingly this appeal is hereby dismissed.

1

. Fed.R.Civ.P. 59.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 36 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 21977: 11978: 11980: 21983: 21986: 11987: 11989: 11990: 31992: 41993: 11997: 12000: 12003: 22005: 12006: 22012: 22015: 12018: 22021: 12022: 12023: 22024: 119752026peak 1992 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list