TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Weldon Clark Dixon v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Weldon Clark DIXON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellant

Dixon v. Beto, 472 F.2d 598 (5th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 23, 1973
Docket
No. 72-2732
Judges
Bell, Dyer, Clark
Citations
472 F.2d 5981973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12052

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is the second appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas where the district court ordered the state court to hold an evidentiary hearing in a habeas matter involving a state prisoner. In Anderson v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1972, 469 F.2d 1076 [dated November 27,1972], we held that the district court exceeded its authority in so doing. We make the same holding here. Cf. also Clark v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1972, 465 F.2d 888 .

The exhaustion of state remedies doctrine, Ex Parte Royall, 117 U.S. 241 , 6 S.Ct. 734 , 29 L.Ed. 868 (1886) ; Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), is based on principles of comity to afford the state courts the first opportunity to pass on the claims of state prisoners that they were deprived of federal constitutional rights in connection with their restraint. Once state remedies are exhausted, it is the duty of the federal courts to pass on such claims. The federal courts are not empowered to order the state courts to make remedies available nor are they authorized to dictate the type of hearing which is to be conducted by the state courts.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • ("The federal courts are not empowered to order the state courts to make remedies available nor are they authorized to dictate the type of hearing which is to be conducted by the state courts.")

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1973: 21978: 11980: 21981: 11983: 11993: 11994: 12007: 12021: 12026: 119732026peak 1973 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (1963) 3,275
Ex Parte Royall, 117 U.S. 241 (1886) 843
Anderson v. Beto, 469 F.2d 1076 (5th Cir. 1972) 8
Clark v. C. Murray Henderson, 465 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1972) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list