TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Norman Allen Gibson v. City of Seattle (Washington), Department of Police

Norman Allen GIBSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE (WASHINGTON), DEPARTMENT OF POLICE Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Gibson v. City of Seattle (Wash.), 472 F.2d 1220 (9th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 19, 1973
Docket
No. 26553
Judges
Ely, Goodwin, Ferguson
Citations
472 F.2d 12201973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12092

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in part and reverse in part a judgment dismissing an action brought pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S. C. § 1983.

The action alleges that the defendants seized and confiscated certain items of plaintiff’s personal property without cause but under color of state law. The district court dismissed the action as to all defendants.

The dismissal of the City of Seattle is affirmed, as that municipal defendant is not a “person” under the Civil Rights Act. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961).

With regard to the individual defendants, the district, court held that the Act did not apply to property rights and that therefore it lacked jurisdiction. Subsequent to that determination, the Supreme Court in Lynch v. Household Finance Corp., 405 U.S. 538 , 92 S.Ct. 1113 , 31 L.Ed.2d 424 (1972), held that property rights as well as personal liberties are within the protection of the Civil Rights Act.

The district court dismissed the action relative to the individual defendants for the additional reason that the plaintiff had a state cause of action for common law conversion. The denial of federal jurisdiction upon that ground was rejected in Monroe v. Pape, supra.

The judgment with regard to the City of Seattle is affirmed. It is reversed with regard to the individual defendants.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11975: 21976: 11977: 11992: 119742026peak 1975 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961) 3,951
Lynch v. Household Fin. Corp., 405 U.S. 538 (1972) 524

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list